Skip to main content

A Way-Too-Early, Scouting Report on Duke's Jayson Tatum

I've seen exactly one game of Jayson Tatum, but there's nothing like overly premature scouting reports for the NBA Draft:

  • He already has a strong body and a will to rebound, both offensively and defensively. His first defensive position, he had a solid box-out, defensive rebound, and quick lead pass. He still needs to learn where to position for rebounds, often times committing to a box-out directly underneath the basket.
  • He seems a little raw around the rim. He didn't go up strong on a dump off, and his shot got swatted. He also threw up a couple floaters that lacked touch.
  • This is irrelevant, but Frank Jackson looks like Bruno Mars, if he were in that one Fresh Prince episode in the country club.
  • His post game is very refined for his age, especially his footwork, which allows him take advantage of his athleticism. He may be a little too reliant on his speed against bigger defenders in the post, which he'll need to work on for the NBA, where he'll be defended by athletic equivalents.
  • He seems to be reluctant to shoot open jumpers, which makes sense for players who've relied on athleticism and rim runs to score their entire life. But his stroke doesn't look broken - probably just a confidence issue.
  • Luke Kennard may have sneaky upside as an NBA prospect. He's got a quick enough release to be a catch-and-shoot, and if he tightens his handle, he could be a secondary slasher and playmaker off curls. Very poor man's Klay Thompson, maybe, or what people hoped Nik Stauskas would pan out to be.
  • Last note on Taytum - he's got quick hands. Both on catches and when defending, especially weaker ball-handlers. He has the sense to slap down on players who haven't secured the ball tightly in triple threat.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The NBA Time Machine

"I do not do cross-era comparisons." - David Jacoby That's how a lot of smart people view the NBA throughout history, as distinct eras, each with their most dominant players and most dominant teams - the 1960s with Russell's Celtics battling the individual greatness of Wilt, the coke-addled 70s with the rise of Kareem, the star power of the 1980s, featuring Magic's Lakers, Bird's Celtics, the Bad Boy Pistons, and Dr. J's Sixers, Jordan in the 90s, the barren wasteland of the early to mid-2000s with Shaq and Kobe, and then LeBron's world. Another way to distinguish these eras are through playing styles: The 1970s were all about gliding as close to the hoop and making smooth finishes near the rim. The 1980s were about pushing the pace and finding an open man in space. Jordan ushered in an era of hero ball with an emphasis on surrounding good post up players with cutting (i.e. MJ in Chicago, Hakeem in Houston, and Ewing in New York), something that c...
Post a Comment
Read more

Investigating Russell Westbrook's Triple Doubles

So, I recently came out and said that I'd pick Kawhi Leonard for MVP over Russell Westbrook and his triple doubles. Based on the number of OKC games I've seen, the infamous eye test gives me the impression that Russell Westbrook, when he hunts his stats causes more harm than good to the Thunder. Obviously, a true statistical approach to this question would be difficult and very time-consuming, but I did a rough analysis to gain some insight on Russell Westbrook, his triple doubles, and how they translate to wins. First bookkeeping note here. I classified each of Russ's games as a Legit Triple Double (LTD), a Barely Got There triple double (BGT), a Nearly Missed triple double (NM), and a Missed It triple double (MI). A BGT is a triple double where the sum of the number of assists and the number of rebounds is less than 22. An NM is a non-triple double where Russ had at least 9 assists or 9 rebounds. Of the 80 games I'm considering (I'm throwing out the last two ga...
Post a Comment
Read more