Skip to main content

Boogie's Fake Team

On a recent TrueHoop Show episode with Kevin Arnovitz and Kevin Pelton, they played a little game that piqued my interests. After a discussion about how Sacramento and Vlade Divac have failed DeMarcus Cousins (I really don't want to rehash that; that would take nearly a thousand words and would be really depressing), they ended their conversation with drafting a fake team under the salary cap for Boogie.

So, I'm unabashedly going to do that: a 13-man roster, under the salary cap, with the sole purpose of making Boogie happy and in the Finals contention.

Starting Lineup
PG: John Wall (Salary: $16.96 million)
SG: Rodney Hood (Salary: $1.41 million)
SF: Jae Crowder (Salary: $6.29 million)
PF: Serge Ibaka (Salary: $12.25 million)
C: DeMarcus Cousins (Salary: $15.85 million)

Bench
PG: Cory Joseph (Salary: $7.35 million)
SG: Malcolm Brogdon (Salary: $925 thousand)
SF: Tony Snell (Salary: $2.37 million)
PF: Channing Frye (Salary: $7.81 million)
C: Willie Cauley-Stein (Salary: $3.55 million)
PG: T.J. McConnell (Salary: $875 thousand)
SG: Jordan McCrae (Salary: $875 thousand)
PF: Jarell Martin (Salary: $1.29 million)

And, we are under the salary cap with room to pay Rodney Hood when he demands a max contract in a couple years. This lineup is easily ten deep, and in the playoffs, the rotation can easily tighten to nine. Wall and Boogie can play pick-and-roll really well together, and since Boogie's now a 37% three-point shooter, Wall will have ample space in the lane to finish on pick-and-pop schemes. Hood and Crowder can spot up, if need be, and are adept post-entry passers for Boogie. The team is also going to be a monster on defense, with Ibaka protecting the paint and Wall, Hood, and Crowder playing intense ball denial.

What opens up the floor geometry is the bench. I would personally stagger Wall's minutes and insert him with the bench mob - playing off Frye's amazing shooting. Joseph can play off-the-ball with Hood handling mostly, or he can play a Mike Conley-lite role, feeding Boogie on every possession and cutting or spotting up. Again, this is entirely speculative, but it's a fun thought exercise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The NBA Time Machine

"I do not do cross-era comparisons." - David Jacoby That's how a lot of smart people view the NBA throughout history, as distinct eras, each with their most dominant players and most dominant teams - the 1960s with Russell's Celtics battling the individual greatness of Wilt, the coke-addled 70s with the rise of Kareem, the star power of the 1980s, featuring Magic's Lakers, Bird's Celtics, the Bad Boy Pistons, and Dr. J's Sixers, Jordan in the 90s, the barren wasteland of the early to mid-2000s with Shaq and Kobe, and then LeBron's world. Another way to distinguish these eras are through playing styles: The 1970s were all about gliding as close to the hoop and making smooth finishes near the rim. The 1980s were about pushing the pace and finding an open man in space. Jordan ushered in an era of hero ball with an emphasis on surrounding good post up players with cutting (i.e. MJ in Chicago, Hakeem in Houston, and Ewing in New York), something that c...

Mock Draft - Sweet Sixteen Edition

The Sweet Sixteen is set, and it's time for NBA viewers to think about what prospects fit best with lottery teams. I simulated a fake lottery, and let's go: 1. Boston Celtics (via Brooklyn Nets) - Markelle Fultz This is a no-brainer for Boston, affording them the ability to build steadily for a future sans Isaiah Thomas. Some kind of future core around Fultz and Jaylen Brown is a starting spot if this realization of the Celtics can't flip their future assets for a superstar. Fultz can play alongside Thomas now, as a playmaker and an off-ball scorer, making Smart and/or Bradley expendable for trades. 2. Phoenix Suns - Josh Jackson Phoenix doesn't need one of the point guards in this point guard rich draft. But they could really benefit from a swing-forward. They'll probably be deciding between Josh Jackson and Jayson Tatum, the former of which is more athletic, a better play-maker, and a much superior defender, all the while being a worse offensive player, at ...